Legislators back UTA plan to skip local rail-line consent
The bill would allow UTA to bypass local approvals, permits and fees for anything it builds within the 200-foot-wide rail corridor that stretches from Brigham City to Payson.
The legislation is not a tactic being used by UTA to impact communities without consulting with local leaders, bill sponsor Sen. Gregory Bell, R-Farmington, told members of the Political Subdivisions Interim Committee. It simply prevents the regional project from being delayed by external demands, he said.
For example, some cities have requested a chain-link fence along the corridor, a multimillion-dollar and time-consuming addition to the project that never was needed when freight trains were operating on the line.
"They [UTA] are very flexible," Bell said. "They just don't want to be held hostage."
Jody Hoffman, policy analyst for the League of Cities and Towns, said that local governments fear losing control of projects within their borders because of unanticipated impacts. For example, UTA could place billboards within the corridor, even if a city has banned them.
"It's a 200-foot corridor where UTA could put anything up as a revenue source and the cities can't do anything about it," she said. "This bill is giving them [UTA] an atomic bomb."
Kathryn Pett, general counsel for UTA, said giving the agency an exemption was only designed to facilitate the regional commuter rail project, not to eliminate local control from the process. Because UTA receives funding from local governments and their governing board is appointed by city councils and county commissions, it would be counter-productive to ignore the concerns of those same officials, she said.
"Nobody at UTA has ever said that we don't want to talk," Pett said. "We consider ourselves employed by local government."
Sen. Lyle Hillyard, R-Logan, urged the cities to negotiate their own, individual agreements with UTA before the January session begins. He said he suspects the commuter rail project will override legislators' usual concerns about local control.
"The project will override the concerns of individual cities when it goes to the Legislature, Halyard said. "It is not a Layton City issue, not a Centerville City issue. It is a state of Utah issue."
E-mail: jloftin@desnews.com
Comments
- Millsap creams hometown team 12:32 a.m.
- LDS silent on issues 12:18 a.m.
- Interpreter grateful for help 12:18 a.m.
- Jazz sting Hornets 12:18 a.m.
- Building a legacy 12:18 a.m.
- Poll voters face dilemma 12:18 a.m.
- Utes bear coach's stamp 12:18 a.m.
- Emery's quick start a surprise 12:18 a.m.
- Miles suffers ankle sprain 12:17 a.m.
- Jazz bench dominates 12:17 a.m.
- Utes No. 1 for Utahns
161 - BYU's '09 football opener is OK
151 - U. season greatest in our history
143 - Shurtleff considers BCS probe
134 - BYU falters late against Wake
112 - Official 2009 BYU football schedule
108 - Bush is distinctly Bush
106 - FLDS mother requests jury for case
80 - Tough Jazz win a streak starter?
76 - Utah last in per-pupil spending
70
Doesn't Huntsman Sr have a jet?
I remember a day when escalante played at the byu summer tourny, beat dixie,...
BYU was 14-1 in 1996 & 12-2 in 2001.
What? The BCS rules weren't relaxed in 2004. In 2004 a non-automatic...
Since there is typically only a limited amount of insurance when a person is...
Im very excited for Gary Anderson but Brent Guy really built this team up and...
First of all, BYU did not go 14-0. Ever. They've had ONE undefeated season...
Send CJ to the developemental league for the developemental league
Sponsorships are generally multi-year deals (i.e. the Delta Center changing...
Why can't I find Korver on the All Star ballot?

You can be the first to comment on this story.