Utah spyware law draws N.Y. suit

Published: Tuesday, April 13, 2004 11:39 a.m. MDT
E-MAIL | PRINT | FONT + - 
A New York City-based Internet advertising company is suing Utah, alleging that the recently passed Spyware Control Act violates the U.S. and state constitutions.

The suit, filed late Monday in 3rd District Court by WhenU.com Inc., lists the state, Gov. Olene Walker and Attorney General Mark Shurtleff as defendants. It seeks to have the court prohibit the act from taking effect early next month.

The act, passed by the Legislature during the 2004 general session, is designed to cut down on spyware by making it illegal to create or install the software, which monitors Internet activity and sends that information elsewhere, usually without the user being aware of it or consenting to it. The law also curbs pop-up advertising on the Internet and calls for penalties of $10,000 per violation.

The lawsuit, which claims the law violates WhenU's constitutionally protected right to advertise, indicates lawmakers intended to combat software programs that invade computer users' privacy.

"While protecting the privacy of computer users is an important objective, the act does little or nothing to achieve it," the suit states. "WhenU's software, one of the apparent targets of the act, is installed only with user consent, and does not invade the privacy of computer users. The state of Utah does not have a valid interest in regulating a company like WhenU, nor, given the nature of the Internet, can it promulgate such regulations without impermissibly burdening interstate commerce."

Story continues below

Paul Murphy, spokesman for the Utah Attorney General's Office, said the state has not seen the lawsuit and is not prepared to comment.

The suit claims the act, while intended to prohibit spyware from delivering advertisements to computer users, actually protects Web sites of online merchants "from lawful competition from software-based contextually relevant advertisements, regardless of whether the software invades user privacy."

The suit says the act was formed in large part due to lobbying by Draper-based 1-800 Contacts Inc., which sells replacement contact lenses via the Internet. 1-800 Contacts and WhenU have been involved in litigation since 2002 in federal court in New York, with 1-800 Contacts trying to prohibit WhenU from placing Internet ads for 1-800 Contacts' competitors.

1-800 Contacts has been perturbed by the look-alike pop-up ads, showing offers from competitors but made to look as if they were placed by 1-800 Contacts.

But WhenU states that its advertising is "contextual marketing," meaning it advertises products and services to consumers who have a "demonstrated interest in those products and services."

"Because they are contextually relevant, WhenU's advertisements are useful to consumers and effective for advertisers," the suit states.

Comments

You can be the first to comment on this story.

Latest comments

What Planet, I am talking parochial schools, not private schools. And I'm...

Obviously most of you do not know that Oly has 2 starters of which are both...

Israeli mortars kill 30 in Gaza

Dude, have you ever been to Israel ? have your sweet home ever been shelled...

The last line is perfect. Perfect.

Utah must stimulate voter turnout

Here's is my point, GWB; Encouraging the ignorant to vote when they have no...

Its funny how the same Yute fans than cry fowl regarding BYU's National...

@ Jerry Bone Just in case you hadn't noticed Kosta is getting all of...

Hypocrite protesters

So, are you one of the fools who voted for Cheney/Bush? How about...

You don't have to look no futher then the BCS comittee. The chair of the BCS...

In 2005, Andrew Bogut also won the John Wooden Award as the Most Outstanding...

Advertisements