2 views of Lake Powell: 'insurance policy,' outdated

Published: Sunday, Sept. 26, 2004 9:37 p.m. MDT
E-MAIL | PRINT | FONT + - 
Sharply conflicting views about the value of Glen Canyon Dam were voiced during a panel discussion at the Utah Historical Society's annual meeting last week.

Glen Canyon Dam and its reservoir, Lake Powell, provide security by regulating the flow of the Colorado River, said Wayne Cook, former director of the Upper Colorado River Commission. The river carries about 5.5 million acre-feet of water during a dry year, he said. "In the flood years it's been known to run 25 million acre-feet."

The reservoir was built to provide security both from drought for the Upper Colorado River Basin states and safety from floods in the lower basin states, he said. It also guarantees that the lower basin states receive a certain amount of water, pegged at 75 million acre-feet over 10 years.

Doug Hendrix, spokesman for the U.S. Bureau of Reclamation — the agency that manages the federal reservoirs on the Colorado River — said Glen Canyon Dam is one of the most important structures on the river system. "It exists because we have chosen to live in the arid Southwest," he said.

The dividing point between the upper and lower basin states is Lee's Ferry, Ariz., just below the Utah border, he said.

Story continues below

Lake Powell amounts to "an insurance policy" for residents of the upper basin, which includes Utah, he said. Without the lake storing water for the lower basin, this region could not provide water to the other basin — water that the upper states are legally required to provide.

In that case, Utah's would-be water users might have to watch their rivers flow past en route to Nevada and California without being able to use the water.

The area is going through its fifth straight year of drought, Hendrix said. It is important that states, the federal government, Indian tribes and others work together during these tough times, he added.

The Southwest is "extremely fortunate" to have dams, Hendrix said. They have allowed the government to meet all its water delivery obligations even during these dry years, "and we'll continue to do so, even if the drought lasts several more years."

Moderator for the panel was Bud Rusho, former spokesman for the bureau's Upper Colorado Region who is now retired and who has won notice as a historian. He noted that Wayne Aspinall, the Colorado congressman who helped sponsor the Glen Canyon legislation, was asked in the middle 1980s if the dam could be built then, in light of the environmental movement and other changes since its construction began in 1956.

Aspinall simply replied, "Not a chance," Rusho said.

Dan McCool, director of the American West Center at the University of Utah and a political science professor, said the dam is "the monument to that era," the 1950s.

Comments

You can be the first to comment on this story.

Latest comments

If Texas is one missed tackle, Florida one missed extra point and USC one...

I have called the BYU Athletic Department twice with this suggestion and NO...

send us to the colliseum, send us to the swamp, send us anywhere to get...

We'll know "how well it worked" when the committee seriously looks into the...

South Salt Lake skunk case dismissed

Mr. Turner's lesson -- which is a lesson for all of us -- is that when a...

Why do people think they can get away with the insurance policy plot. NEVER...

I agree Utah had a couple close calls, but they didn't lose any. Can Florida...

UHSAA looking to cut costs

offices are located in Midvale. They have four Executive Directors and a...

Quick somebody, take a poll. Name the 5 toughest conferences in college...

I apologize. I honestly thought that you are looking for a fair assessment of...

Advertisements