Ballot issues keep Utahns involved
Pignanelli & Webb
In addition, some jurisdictions will place on the ballot opinion questions to increase sales taxes for transportation by a quarter cent, possibly a $65 million bond proposal for Hogle Zoo improvements, various school district bonds, recreation/arts/parks taxes, a bond for police facilities, and others.
A significant public policy question is this: Are ballot questions a good way to make public policy? To raise taxes? To decide controversial issues?
Pignanelli: "The Legislative power of the State shall be vested in ... a Senate and House of Representatives ... and the people of the State of Utah." (Constitution of Utah, Article VI.)
Our forefathers/mothers were visionary and prescient. They were confident that Utahns could do more than just approve of constitutional amendments but consider tax increases, set policy and provide direction for the state. The constitution clearly contradicts officials who believe quality decision making resides in legislative bodies.
I am a fan of public legislating. Taxpayers should participate in decisions that will obligate their households to future expenses. Citizens need to express their opinion regarding public education, open space, transportation, etc. Also, ballot actions usually require intense education of the electorate — which is always good.
Along with other sponsors of the 2002 Radioactive Waste Initiative, we enlightened Utahns regarding dumping activities in the western desert. We raised concerns and asked for action. Although we were trounced at the ballot box, Utahns remembered our message. Consequently, over time much our original petition has been satisfied through legislation or acts by Gov. Jon Huntsman Jr. (i.e. restricting higher levels of radioactive waste, reforming the approval process, etc.). The upcoming referendum over vouchers will mirror the radioactive waste fight. While the pro-voucher organizations will likely lose in November, their efforts will foster important dialogue focused on reforming public education.
Legislators should welcome the voucher referendum. Their constituents will have the satisfaction of expressing their support or concerns regarding state assistance to students attending private schools. Because of this outlet for opinions, most lawmakers will not be held responsible for the voucher vote in the last session.
Recent comments
Excellent commentary. Let the Legislatures make policy,and if you...
SNH | Aug. 19, 2007 at 1:58 p.m.
