Provo Council race set fund-raising record
Turley's $48,000 smashed previous mark of $22,000
The lesson was obvious. Porter was up against a money machine he couldn't match in a grass-roots bid to unseat the incumbent Provo City Councilman.
What Porter didn't know until Friday, a month after the election, was that Turley was burying him under such an avalanche of cash that it obliterated the previous record for spending on a Provo City Council race.
Turley spent $48,400 to win a second term, while Porter spent $10,700. Turley defeated Porter by 652 of the 13,704 votes cast.
"Oh, my gosh," Porter said Friday when told by the Deseret Morning News about Turley's final spending report. "You're kidding me. Wow. It's tough to compete with that kind of firepower."
The previous record was set two years ago when former mayor George Stewart won a seat on the council by spending $22,500.
"We obviously overshot," Turley said.
Early in the race, he said he expected to break Stewart's record because of a recent trend toward huge leaps in spending in Provo races. For example, when three of the seven council seats were up for election in 2005, the candidates spent nearly $70,000, seven times more than had been spent on the same three seats the last time they were contested.
Instead, it was Turley who unleashed a torrent of dollars. He spent $26,800 in the campaign's final week, more than Stewart spent in the entire previous record-setting campaign. He suggested that if all donations had to be reported within 24 hours, candidates would know better where they stood.
"At the end of the day," Turley said of Porter, "he didn't step into the big leagues, and we did."
Turley's huge financial advantage he spent $6.75 per vote to Porter's $1.64 was tempered by the fact that Porter tried to buck the trend. He spent less than what either finalist spent on the same seat in 2003. That year, Turley spent $17,000 and incumbent Stan Lockhart spent $11,600.
"It was never about trying to go out and solicit funds," said Porter, who disliked asking for money. "Instead, we worked on the message and went door to door."
He said he was naive about the effort it would take to run a citywide race and should have started going door to door earlier.
The two citywide seats on the Provo City Council are far more expensive than the five district seats because in a citywide race there are five times more voters to reach.
Recent comments
I agree with Sour Grapes. Steve was in this thing to win. If you&...
IM | Dec. 10, 2007 at 12:19 p.m.
Sounds like sour grapes to me.
Steve infiltrated your good old...
Sour Grapes! | Dec. 8, 2007 at 10:51 p.m.
Surprise, surprise. He bought the election... Shame on those who...
John P | Dec. 8, 2007 at 5:39 p.m.



