Ban quotas, gain public trust
That is why HB264 was concocted. The bill, in simple language, would prohibit police agencies from telling their officers to pen a set number of tickets. It's pretty straight forward. But what has been interesting is the number of complaints about it. If, as some claim, there are no quotas, then why the objections? Are they afraid lawmakers could use up too much ink? Do they fret about sending "the wrong message"? What's the beef?
If there are no ticket quotas now, ban them outright so there won't be in the future. It's more than trying to "solve a problem that doesn't exist." A problem does exist. And the problem is public trust and perception. Codify the ban, put it on the books and set it in concrete so that citizens don't feel they're getting the old run-around.
If inspectors were expected to meet quotas (say, three a day) for the number of restaurant violations or building code violations they were expected to write, there would be a fuss. That would become inventing violations that don't exist. But traffic is a different animal.
Recent comments
Remeber, the officers on the streets are forced to write tickets...
Tommy V | Jan. 26, 2008 at 12:23 p.m.
This topic has many facets. The first elements of ensuring competent...
Rick Hepner | Jan. 26, 2008 at 8:20 a.m.
It does not say they can not write tickets. They simply can not require...
Allen | Jan. 26, 2008 at 5:44 a.m.


