An Olympic boycott? Been there, done that
Doug Robinson
You know the drill: When the going gets tough, when nobody can figure out anything better to do, hold the Olympics hostage.
With the Beijing Olympics set for this summer, everyone with a cause is coming out of the woodwork to hold the Games as hostage — environmentalists, human rights activists, the Tibet crowd (what, no PETA?). The usual celebrity crowd — Richard Gere, Mia Farrow, the Dalai Lama, Steven Spielberg, George Clooney — is leading the charge against the war in Burma, genocide in Darfur, air pollution in China, and China's 57-year rule of Tibet.
Not that their causes aren't just and good — just misdirected.
Just a few questions: Isn't it a sign of diplomatic and political failure that these causes have nothing stronger to barter with than an athletic event?
Isn't this something the IOC should have considered before they ever made Beijing the host?
Then again, is there any place on Earth perfect enough to host an Olympics these days and thus able to avoid a boycott?
Here's one reason you do anything except boycott: Henry Marsh's flag ceremony.
Where else could such a thing have occurred?
"It was one of the highlights of my career," says Marsh. "I had goose bumps. That symbolizes more than anything why we need to keep politics out of it."
A year later, the U.S. boycotted the Moscow Olympics and took some 60 nations with them to protest the Soviet invasion of Afghanistan. For Marsh, as well as thousands of other athletes, it was a lost opportunity. In 1980, he had the fastest time in the world in the steeplechase. He not only won the U.S. Olympic Trials but also produced an American record and was voted Outstanding Athlete of the competition.
But he never got to compete in the Olympics.
"It was stupid," says Marsh. "The only people hurt by the boycott were the athletes."
The Soviets left Afghanistan eight years later. They didn't leave because of the boycott; they left because they couldn't beat Afghan insurgents. Ironically, the U.S. provided financial support to those insurgents, some of whom are now among the terrorists the U.S. is fighting in the Middle East.
In Marsh's view, those who boycott the Olympics to protest a cause have it all backward. Their cause would be better served by having an Olympics, not by destroying it.
Recent comments
Set your clock back 160 years, Doug. If the media talking about an...
Michael | March 19, 2008 at 5:23 a.m.
A little perspective here. We're talking about a religious leader...
Michael | March 19, 2008 at 5:06 a.m.
The LA Newspaper just had a headline saying that the US would not...
MY SLC | March 18, 2008 at 3:43 p.m.
