2 reports say iProvo should bill departments
Consultants also want to see better attitudes from city employees
Among recommendations, Doug Dawson of CCG Consulting and Scott Chandler of Franklin Court Partners suggested the city start billing its departments for the use of the system. Notably, Dawson also said iProvo's telecom employees need an attitude adjustment when it comes to dealing with retail providers MStar, Veracity and Nuvont Communications.
"Almost to a person, your staff seems to believe that the retailers aren't doing things the right way and they seem to resent them," he wrote. "This resentment carries forward into the relationship between your employees and the retailers."
Last year, the city hired the two consulting firms to analyze its fiber-optic telecommunications network, which provides Internet, phone and television/video services. Since its inception in 2004, iProvo hasn't lived up to growth expectations, and instead of being a cash cow as promised, it continues to drain city coffers. (See related chart on B2.)
According to Provo's comprehensive annual financial statements for the past five years, iProvo has cost the city about $7.5 million, which does not include the $39.5 million the city bonded to construct iProvo's backbone. City officials estimate the system will cost the city another $2 million by this year's end.
"You need to find a way to get employees to realize that their job is simple," Dawson wrote. "To keep the retailers happy."
Dawson also said the city has not been charging city departments for use of the iProvo system, and that should change.
"Each ... city department can be considered to 'own' a part of the city-owned fiber network," Dawson wrote, "and should pick up a cost of the network so that the network is there for them in the future as they need it."
Roughly 10,000 customers occupy 25 percent of iProvo's existing network, Dawson said, and the long-term plan is to expand that network to 20,000, which leaves half the network available. With 15 percent reserved for engineering purposes, there is another 35 percent of the network available for use by the rest of the city.
Dawson then said the city could charge departments annual fees totaling about $2.9 million for the system.
In his report, Chandler complimented Provo on its telecommunication network. He said phone companies such as Qwest are struggling with the costs and complexity of upgrading their existing networks to be comparable to iProvo. But he said the city could utilize the system further by implementing new technologies, including an advanced metering infrastructure — a system to measure, collect and analyze electric and water usage.
Recent comments
This consultant has some strange ideas. Provo City Government is...
Confused | April 22, 2008 at 2:08 p.m.
How much longer must us citizens of Provo carry the burden for the...
How Much Longer? | April 21, 2008 at 2:45 p.m.
"Each ... city department can be considered to 'own'...
Anonymous | April 21, 2008 at 12:42 p.m.
