Customers are upset as UTA considers raising fares
The UTA board of directors will decide that issue at its May 28 meeting.
About two dozen people attended the first of three UTA meetings on a possible surcharge — this one Tuesday night at the UTA offices in Salt Lake — and most in attendance seemed against any increases.
Those who can't attend one of the meetings can e-mail, telephone or mail in their comments to UTA. Deadline for comments is May 20. It is also noted that these three UTA meetings accept public comment individually but that there is not an open microphone in front of an audience.
About 18 members of the combined Anti-Hunger Action Committee and the Disabled Rights Action Committee walked out of Tuesday's meeting to protest the lack of a public microphone, missing a UTA presentation and a chance to make comment there.
"It's unfortunate they decided to leave," UTA general manager John Inglish said. "We do many hearings this way."
He also said "fuel prices are astronomical" and that even though UTA has made its own cost reductions that total $2.7 million, it has no other internal way — short of cutting service — to make up a projected $5 million deficit by the end of the year.
He also promised the surcharge will come off, if fuel prices go down.
Since Jan. 1, diesel fuel has skyrocketed more than 25 percent. Considering UTA will be purchasing 6.1 million gallons of diesel fuel this year, every 10-cent increase in fuel adds as much as $610,000 to UTA's operating costs.
The two aforementioned committees held a special protest prior to UTA's first public hearing, chanting, "High fares are unfair."
"I think it's crazy," Cozette Campbell of Riverton said. "I take the bus everywhere. But I won't ride it if they raise the prices."
Tammi Diaz of South Salt Lake had a similar opinion.
"I'm totally against it," she said. "It's further destruction of the bus system," noting that higher prices will probably cause UTA to lose some passengers.
"I think they're pricing low-income people off the bus," Bill Tibbitts of Salt Lake, said. "This is a pretty clear case of price gouging."
UTA has already reduced its costs through hiring delays and the elimination of certain contracted services, as well as restricted travel, decreased supply purchases and the implementation of other strategic cost-cutting practices. However, this is not enough to offset rising fuel prices.
Recent comments
There is no Santa Clause. When prices go up dramatically either...
Responsible Citizen | May 15, 2008 at 9:45 a.m.
Cut the number of FrontRunner trains! I'm taking it from Layton...
Ben Hughes | May 14, 2008 at 4:00 p.m.
Hold off on CONSTRUCTION on LIGHT RAIL and FRONTRUNNER and CUT OUT...
Tammi Diaz | May 14, 2008 at 3:02 p.m.
