Darwinism isn't provable

Published: Monday, May 19, 2008 12:04 a.m. MDT
E-MAIL | PRINT | FONT + - 
This is in reply to Romm Jackson Jr. (Readers' Forum, May 15). Jackson claims that Darwinism is a theory that has been widely tested and that creationism is not provable. I must admit that creationism might not have scientific proof, but I would like to point out that neither does Darwinism. There has never been any concrete evidence of Darwinism.

Darwinism is the rebirth of medieval science when people believed that living things — like maggots — were born from nonliving things like rotten meat. These beliefs were put to rest after Louis Pasteur discovered that maggots came not from rotten meat but were attracted to it. Darwinism, on the other hand, believes that for living things to exist, they must have come from nonliving things. I guess the medieval scientists were right after all.

Tyler Thomas

South Weber

Recent comments

Evolution doesn't explain how the turtle got there either (and...

Anonymous | May 23, 2008 at 11:47 p.m.

151 comments and no one has proven anything. Interesting, butI am...

Just Me | May 23, 2008 at 8:37 p.m.

To Anon:

You still didn't explain how the Glapagos Turtle...

Town Heathan | May 23, 2008 at 11:35 a.m.