Utah County fraud victims seek 2nd chance at restitution

Published: Tuesday, June 10, 2008 12:07 a.m. MDT
E-MAIL | PRINT | FONT + - 
PROVO — It's been four years since an Alpine man used real-estate promises to siphon nearly $23 million out of about 311 victims, then promised to make things right after he got caught.

Michael J. Fitzgerald still owes nearly $20 million in restitution, but despite that, several victims asked Monday in 4th District Court that he not be sentenced in August to what could be 15 years in prison.

Instead, they want him to be allowed to develop 23 acres in Beverly Hills that could bring in the long-awaited restitution.

"Some of us have lost our homes over it, including me," said investor Howard Francis. "We have been hurt significantly. Lives will be ruined if we don't have an opportunity to do this.

"I know it's asking a lot of the court to postpone this, it has gone on for a long time," Francis continued. "(But) we'd really like to have some help and give this plan an opportunity to go forward."

Fitzgerald, 51, pleaded no contest in November 2004 to five felonies of securities fraud, unregistered securities agent and pattern of unlawful activity for allegedly selling promissory notes on developments in California with no collateral backing, according to a 2004 release from the Utah Division of Securities.

Story continues below

A previous attorney told the Deseret News in an earlier story that he believed Fitzgerald was duped by his brother, Charles Elliott Fitzgerald, who took investment money and fled the country. He is being prosecuted by federal and California authorities for similar crimes.

Numerous calls to Michael Fitzgerald's current attorney for clarification were not returned.

Charles Fitzgerald was indicted, along with eight others, in a massive "house-flipping" and mortgage fraud scheme in high-priced California neighborhoods, according to a 2007 release from the U.S. Attorney's Office for the Central District of California.

Charles Fitzgerald pleaded guilty on May 9 and is set to be sentenced Aug. 18, according to the U.S. Attorney's Office in California. However, his plea agreement is sealed.

In July 2006 Michael Fitzgerald entered his no-contest pleas, legally identical to guilty pleas, as a plea-in-abeyance, meaning that if he complied with the agreement — which included paying off half of the restitution in two years — the case would eventually be dismissed.

He failed to do so, and the agreement was broken. He will be sentenced Aug. 18.

However, sending Fitzgerald to prison doesn't solve the victims' problems, his attorney, Mark Griffin, argues.

Instead, Griffin and numerous victims want him to develop the prime Beverly Hills acreage.

"The property is unique," Griffin said. "There are very few parcels like this remaining in Beverly Hills."

Recent comments

What took place in the hearing on Aug 18th?

Anonymous | Aug. 21, 2008 at 9:25 p.m.

Its too bad that we all can't have the government step in when we...

Johny | Aug. 15, 2008 at 10:14 a.m.

Latest comments

A win is a win and a loss is a loss. Utah is 13-0, the next best is only close.

DO these stats take into account that there are fewer abortions in UTah? ...

Demos find LDS silent on issues

To the 6:38 commentator, Go back and read Elder Ballard's General...

The idea of the Fairness Doctrine actually dates back the 1930s, and it was...

Right On! Those Utes are the champs! Anyone else 13-0?

Could there possibly be anything less relevent in todays world? And yet here...

Are you serious? George Bush and his republican genius didn't take your money...

Looks like Waddoups is a gift to democrats during his leadership. Like the...

A law preventing smoking makes sense --- not banning "view" of alcohol?...

Come on liberal loonies! It's not about limbaugh integrity, it's...

Advertisements