East and west Jordan District teams finalizing reports

There's a possibility to avoid arbitration, lawmaker says

Published: Thursday, July 31, 2008 12:21 a.m. MDT
E-MAIL | PRINT | FONT + - 
SANDY — While transition teams representing the freshly split east and west Jordan school districts outline their disagreements in separate reports and prepare for arbitration, at least one lawmaker believes the dispute can still be settled by the two parties.

Sen. Carlene Walker, R-Cottonwood Heights, says attorneys on both sides have been talking and there is still hope for a resolution.

"I think there is still a possibility to avoid arbitration," Walker said in an interview with the Deseret News on Wednesday.

Walker sponsored legislation that gave the green light for Jordan School District to split and also provided rules and guidelines for that action. In November, east-side residents voted to leave Jordan district and form their own school district.

"I feel so deeply and strongly that this division is the best thing for both sides and for the children," Walker said. "There has got to be a way to make it work. I have high hopes."

Walker added that she believes smaller districts — the optimum size being 36,000 students — serve the patrons better. "Smaller districts are more responsive and more effective," she said.

Meanwhile, required documents detailing the conflict between the east and west transition teams are fanning the flames of contention between the two groups.

Story continues below
The separate reports, due by law before Aug. 1, are to include a timeline of past negotiations but could also explain how each side feels and what they want, as well as agreements, disagreements and reasonings for their arguments. The documents could contain future arbitration processes.

The reports are to be given to the boards representing East Jordan District, West Jordan District and the original Jordan District.

If no agreement can be reached regarding splitting assets and liabilities, the east and west transition teams are to choose an arbitrator by Sept. 1. The two arbitrators are then to select a third arbitrator by Sept. 15.

From there, the arbitration process would ensue. The arbitrators act much like judges. Both sides would present their case.

Chairmen of east- and west transition teams told the Deseret News on Wednesday they believe there is no hope for mediation at this point and arbitration is likely.

East transition team Chairman Steve Newton said they would like to discuss issues but the west transition team won't accept their proposals. Mediation is useless if one party doesn't want to participate, he said. "It takes two to tango. And their position is they aren't going to tango," Newton said. "How do you agree when they won't tango?"

Ralph Haws, chairman of the west transition team, said, "The key issue is what is fair and equitable. We have yet to come to a point we feel is fair and equitable."

Recent comments

Actualy Crabby2.

The new District, Jordan East, plans to...

funny truth | Aug. 5, 2008 at 9:08 a.m.

I will hold Cullimore, Curtis, and Walker accountable for their role...

Crabby | Aug. 2, 2008 at 11:02 a.m.

Back room deals make for bad government. This thing has been a disaster...

Crabby Deal. | Aug. 1, 2008 at 8:53 p.m.