No plans to change referendum law

Published: Thursday, Aug. 21, 2008 9:25 a.m. MDT
E-MAIL | PRINT | FONT + - 
GOP legislative leaders said Wednesday that they have no plans to change the state's current referendum petition process to make it the same as the state's citizen initiative petition process.

"Because the referendum is a different system — it says to the Legislature, 'You goofed up' — it should be an easier system" for citizens to access, said Senate President John Valentine, R-Orem.

Citizens seeking to repeal a law passed by the Legislature via the referendum petition system "should not have to meet the higher bar" of the initiative system — which is a different process when studied closely, noted Valentine.

Tuesday, the Deseret News reported that GOP legislative leaders were looking at moving the referendum petition requirements to the "higher bar" of the initiative petition process.

Some legislators were considering that, Valentine acknowledged, and there was considerable study and discussion about the issue.

But leaders concluded that there was a good argument to keep the two systems — which at first blush may seem the quite similar — separate.

"I can only speak for myself," but if a lawmaker introduced a bill moving the referendum petition requirements to the "higher bar" of the initiative process, "I would have to be convinced there was an overwhelming need" before he would vote for that bill, Valentine said Wednesday morning. He said that GOP legislative leaders, as a group, have no plans to try to make the change.

Story continues below

The difference between the two petition systems came up a year ago when public education supporters filed a referendum petition following the 2007 Legislature, seeking to repeal the newly-passed private school voucher.

Legislators then discovered that when they raised the bar on the initiative petition law, they failed to address the similar referendum petition law.

Valentine told the newspaper last summer that it may make sense to have the same petition requirements for both laws, so citizens wouldn't be confused over what they needed to do under each system.

After the Utah Supreme Court overturned one legislative attempt to make the initiative process more restrictive, lawmakers got high court approval when they adopted a new initiative law that requires a certain percent of registered voter signatures coming from a certain number of Senate districts.

The referendum law remains like the old initiative law — 10 percent of voters in 15 counties. That lower bar allows referendum-seekers to get a lot of signatures in big population counties, like Salt Lake County, which is more mixed in political demographics and perhaps more likely to overturn a legislative action.

Recent comments

Orem Parent - it is obvious you will not be happy with education...

Algonquin | Aug. 21, 2008 at 10:02 p.m.

Latest comments

Jazz blowout Paul's Hornets

Please stop with the in your face advertisements that cover up the website as...

Timpview receiver chooses USU

USU first gets the top QB in the state and now the top WR. Looks like...

PLEASE! To say the MWC is a weak conference when it went 6-2 against the PAC...

I think this game demonstrated some of the BIG weaknesses of the Hornets more...

Starting with the pre-bowl rankings, and by process of elimination ... #1...

Like we care?

Restaurant bar restrictions urged

The futility of these legislators and their plans to safeguard children from...

Hypocrite protesters

It is fun to see the left-wing nuts get on here and try to spin reality...

Utah deserves at least a tie for #1 with tomorrow night's winner. Here's...

Wow, there's a lot of deceit on here: Clinton didn't get us involved in...

Advertisements