Bush steps up fight over congressional authority

Published: Wednesday, Aug. 27, 2008 1:36 p.m. MDT
E-MAIL | PRINT | FONT + - 
WASHINGTON — The Bush administration is raising the stakes in a court fight that could change the balance of power between the White House and Congress.

Justice Department lawyers said Wednesday that they will soon ask a federal appeals court not to force the president's top advisers to comply with congressional subpoenas next month. President Bush argues Congress doesn't have the authority to demand information from his aides.

U.S. District Judge John Bates strongly rejected that stance last month, ordering former White House counsel Harriet Miers to testify and White House chief of staff Joshua Bolten to turn over documents related to the firing of federal prosecutors.

It was a historic loss for the Bush administration, a stinging ruling in the first such case ever to make it to the courts.

The House Judiciary Committee responded swiftly, demanding Miers appear Sept. 11 as it investigates whether federal prosecutors were inappropriately fired as part of a White House effort to politicize the Justice Department.

The Bush administration had already indicated it would appeal but Justice Department lawyers said Wednesday that they will ask the court to step in quickly and temporarily put Miers' appearance on hold while the appeal plays out. It's a risky move for an administration that has spent years trying to strengthen the power of the presidency.

Story continues below

If the appeals court refuses to temporarily block the testimony, it would essentially be endorsing Bates' ruling against the Bush administration. Miers likely would have to comply with the subpoena, setting a precedent that would give Congress new teeth in its investigations and weaken future presidents.

On the other hand, if the appeals court temporarily blocks Miers' testimony, it could allow the Bush administration to run out the clock before a new Congress comes to Washington and the case becomes moot. In that situation, Bates' order will have been weakened and future presidents will have more wiggle room.

The Bush administration could have taken other steps to avoid a showdown at the appeals court. Even if it appealed Bates' ruling, it could have negotiated a deal with Congress in which Miers and Bolten provided some information voluntarily and lawmakers agreed to withdraw the lawsuit.

But House counsel Irv Nathan said negotiations have been "completely useless."

"We have not found willing partners on the other side of the table," Nathan said in court Wednesday, telling Bates that "we're being dunced around here."

Justice Department attorney Carl Nichols called those statements misleading but declined to elaborate. He said the Justice Department would file documents with the appeals court by Thursday asking the judges to step in.

Recent comments

Tyis is the way Bush evades the Law

Well | Aug. 28, 2008 at 12:30 p.m.

The ruling against the administration doesn't weaken future...

Republic | Aug. 28, 2008 at 4:06 a.m.

McCain Condemns Overspending in San Diego Fundraiser Republican...

McCain Condemns Overspending | Aug. 27, 2008 at 8:39 p.m.

Latest comments

Set up fundraisers

Terry and Susan gone...and the very most annoying Marty Skold is still on,...

next season will be for BYU fans to find a real Utah fan who is mature enough...

If this "global warming" keeps up, we'll ALL be frozen. Oh, why didn't we...

Oh, this "Utes are #1" rambling is really getting old. They are going to end...

Like the idea Jay. I don't even want to get on my soap box with all of this....

While I applaud the ego boost this provides the excellent U of U Band, it is...

"I would Not Allow My Child To Go" ...and your kid is in college? I hope you...

Hey, I love Sqeaky Eubanks. He is one of the most talented weathermen of...

Are you guys kidding me? If you watched the utah bama game it was obvious...

Advertisements