Salt Lake Demo pushing to repeal criminal slander and libel law

McCoy calls threat of jail time for exercising free speech 'silly'

Published: Wednesday, Oct. 19, 2005 9:39 a.m. MDT
E-MAIL | PRINT | FONT + - 
You should be able to say or write anything you want without fear of going to jail.

So believes state Sen. Scott McCoy, D-Salt Lake, who will introduce a bill in January's 2006 Legislature to repeal Utah's current criminal slander and libel law, which is "unconstitutional, antiquated and outdated," he says.

McCoy, an attorney, would do nothing to Utah's current civil slander, libel or defamation of character laws. So those who feel they have been wronged in speech, print, video, e-mail or other media could still sue the bad-mouther for civil cash damages.

"You just shouldn't go to jail for free speech," says McCoy. "The time for criminalizing speech is over; it's silly."

He has some good company in his corner — the U.S. Supreme Court and the Utah Supreme Court — which have both struck down criminal libel laws.

Utah prosecutors "would not oppose repealing the criminal libel and slander law," said Paul Boyden, executive director of the Statewide Association of Prosecutors.

But McCoy says he'll also explore repealing Utah's criminal defamation of character statute, which he opposes because there should be no criminalization of any kind of free speech.

Story continues below
Boyden said prosecutors likely would oppose that, since the criminal defamation law doesn't have the clear unconstitutional problems that the slander and libel law does.

Utah's current criminal libel law provides for a class B misdemeanor if convicted — up to six months in jail and a $1,000 fine.

That's the same penalty for assault, resisting arrest, driving under the influence, reckless driving, possession of under 1 ounce of marijuana, shoplifting goods valued at under $100, trespassing and dog bites — also class B misdemeanors.

"I have a pet peeve: If a law is unconstitutional, it's deadwood. We should repeal it or fix it," making it useful again, says McCoy.

Attorney Randy Dryer, a libel expert, agrees with McCoy on getting rid of the state's criminal libel statute

"It's bad legal policy. It's bad public policy," says Dryer, who has taught libel law classes for various news organizations. "If we criminalize speech, half of the Founding Fathers would have been in prison" for criticizing government.

Utah's criminal libel and defamation statutes have only been used twice in recent years, said Dryer and McCoy.

Five years ago, a Milford High School student wrote nasty comments about his high school principal and others in his community on a personal Web site. The county attorney prosecuted him, and the case ultimately reached the Utah Supreme Court, which struck down the law because it didn't include basic libel provisions outlined by the U.S. Supreme Court — like proving "actual malice" or having truth as a complete defense, said McCoy.

Comments

You can be the first to comment on this story.