Is state school board really necessary?

Published: Sunday, Jan. 1, 2006 7:39 p.m. MST
E-MAIL | PRINT | FONT + - 
My friend Jim Barker, a former city council member, once told me, "If you want to kill an idea, send it to a committee and it will never see the light of day." Such is the case with the Utah State Board of Education. It raises the question, is a state school board necessary?

It's a committee of 15 that, under our state constitution, is responsible for ". . . the general control and supervision of the public education system" — yet it seems, all too often, it abdicates its responsibility to the Legislature, which then takes the blame for our faltering schools. Local school boards are simply clones of the state board. They are designed to give the appearance of local control while diluting the responsibility among their members so everyone and no one is responsible.

Like many bureaucracies, it looks like board members have lost sight of their constitutional and legislative responsibilities. They seem to have perfected the art of how to avoid making decisions on important matters.

For example: Do nothing, and when things don't get done, ask the Legislature for more money, knowing the request is unrealistic and often fails to account for what they did with the money in the first place. When challenged by the Legislature regarding problems, their reaction is to write more regulations and require schools to follow them. At the bottom of the food chain are the front-line teachers who must then neglect their students in order to meet another accountability requirement.

Story continues below
The problem is that once the board writes a regulation, there is little, if any, monitoring by it to assure compliance. Thus, it makes "accountability" meaningless while giving the public the appearance of taking action. The board claims the criterion referenced testing is important to report on student progress, but it is of little value to teachers in helping students. Spring test results are not available to teachers until the fall of the next school year.

The board sidestepped setting graduation standards consistent with the Utah Basic Skills Competency Tests, leaving it for each local school board to decide what kind of a diploma it would give for students passing the test or not. If the board is not willing to decide on one state standard, why are they needed?

Today's school boards are remnants of good intentions of the Founders, who never imagined there would be a dearth of leadership lacking the will to make tough decisions for the common good. They have the power to make decisions but are reluctant to take the heat from their constituents. While local school boards are careful not to challenge the state board, they do not seem to hesitate to blame the Legislature for their problems.

Recently, a local school board waffled on closing certain schools. Initially, it decided to keep them open, even though they would have to cut programs. Others at the meeting said if they needed more money they would go to the Legislature to ask to correct the problem. What is little known is that local school districts have the power to tax, yet they would rather put the burden on the Legislature. Local boards were created to put education in the hands of citizens who were closest to the people they were to serve. Apparently, some are eager to get the accolades but hesitant to take responsibility.

Comments

You can be the first to comment on this story.