Anti-gaming bill held to address concerns
HB104 would eliminate games at bars and clubs
HB104 would prohibit an establishment licensed by the Department of Alcoholic Beverage Control from sponsoring any event that replicates gambling, such as Texas Hold 'Em poker tournaments or blackjack nights, even if the event is free to enter and does not offer any prizes. The sponsor of the bill, Rep. Stephen Sandstrom, R-Orem, said that his primary focus is "any game you can play in Wendover."
The House Business and Labor Committee held HB104 on a 5-4 vote Wednesday, which can sometimes sound the death knell for a bill. In this case, however, Sandstrom said that he was assured that if he could address some concerns about the bill, it would get a second hearing.
The purpose of HB104 is to curb the proliferation of "gambling-like" activities that he said can lead to or encourage gambling addictions. He chose to single out drinking establishments because enforcement tools are available through the alcohol licensing process. He also contends that bars and clubs exacerbate addiction problems because of excessive consumption of alcohol.
It would not apply to things like pool or golf tournaments — even if they have an entry fee and the winners receive money — because those are not casino games and they require skill, Sandstrom said. It would also not restrict charity events at churches because he would not want to "restrict their freedom to express their religion."
The bill would also have no impact on attempts by city officials in Riverdale to close down a bingo parlor, since it does not serve alcohol, or similar establishments.
But committee members were concerned about singling out bars and private clubs for the restrictions. Rep. Kevin Garn, R-Layton, said that the rules "seem a little restrictive," especially for adults who should have personal choice.
"No one wants to condone gambling in any shape or form," he said. "But we're struggling with games that don't involve risk ... people can go into an establishment and play games as long as they aren't risking anything of value."
If gambling is really the focus of the legislation, then all forms of gambling should be targeted, Rep. Jackie Biskupski, D-Salt Lake, said. Specifically applying the rules to DABC licensees made it appear as if Sandstrom "was lashing out at people who like to have a drink" instead of people who want to gamble.
"If we're trying to prohibit gambling, why won't we do it everywhere — church, school and work?" she said.
E-mail: jloftin@desnews.com
You can be the first to comment on this story.