House OKs a 4th seat for Utah

D.C. would get full-voting member; Bishop vents anger over process

Published: Friday, April 20, 2007 12:45 a.m. MDT
E-MAIL | PRINT | FONT + - 
WASHINGTON — The House approved a bill Thursday giving Utah a fourth seat and the District of Columbia a full-voting member in that chamber, but Rep. Rob Bishop, R-Utah, did not join in on the celebration.

In the 241-177 vote Bishop was the only member who voted "present," meaning he did not vote for or against the bill. Bishop said he supports Utah getting a fourth seat and he supports voting rights for the District of Columbia but he just could not vote for the bill.

"It was a statement of frustration and protest," Bishop said. "They sure treated us like crap through the whole process."

Rep. Jim Matheson, D-Utah, and Rep. Chris Cannon, R-Utah, voted in favor of the two new seats.

Bishop said he initially supported the idea of legislation pairing voting rights for the District of Columbia along with a new additional seat for Utah when the state lost its fight for the fourth seat after the 2000 Census.

But that was several years and several versions of the legislation ago, Bishop said.

"The significance has diminished," he said.

"The bill changed too many times, the process dragged on too long, and Utah got pushed around too much, to the point where the deal in my opinion just wasn't worth it."

Story continues below
Bishop said the Democratic leaders did not allow amendments that would have made the deal better for Utah, such as pushing off electing the new member until the 2008 election — bypassing the state spending money on a special election in 2007 if the bill passes.

Then last year, Congress made the state Legislature draw a four-district map for the state before it would approve the bill. The state did and the governor approved it but Congress adjourned before a final vote on the bill. When the new session started in January, the newer version of the bill threw out the map idea, making the new seat an at-large position, where Bishop would have rather seen that decision left up to the state.

"We don't need D.C.," Bishop said, adding that Utah is going to get its seat after the 2010 Census anyway. Utah was added to the bill not only because it was the next state in line to get a new seat but it would likely go to a Republican while the District's seat would most likely go to a Democrat.

Cannon called the bill "a balance that I think actually works" and said there are ways to make it better down the line.

"What we have done here in the House is a little bit offensive to the Legislature in the state of Utah; we recognize that and promise to work in the Senate on that," Cannon said. "We're mandating what they do for their districts."

But Cannon said he was "thrilled" the bill passed.

"It's not about Utah." Cannon said, "Utah happens to be the state that would get the next vote and that's convenient. This is about how we govern ourselves in America."

Comments

You can be the first to comment on this story.