Low-paid guards at 'critical' U.S. sites
The nation's security industry found itself involuntarily transformed after Sept. 11, 2001, from an army of "rent-a-cops" to protectors of the homeland. But cutthroat competition by security firms trying to win contracts with low bids has kept wages low and high-level training nonexistent.
Richard Bergendahl fights the war on terrorism in Los Angeles for $19,000 a year. Down the block from the high rise he guards is a skyscraper identified by President Bush as a target for a Sept. 11-style airplane attack.
Bergendahl, 55, says he often thinks: "Well, what am I doing here? These people are paying me minimum wage."
Security consultant Hallcrest Systems, in a January 2005 report for the Department of Homeland Security, said its experts believe that 15-20 percent of the country's private security officers protect sites designated by the government as "critical infrastructure." Major cities have a ratio of three or four security officers to each police officer, the study said.
A New Jersey Democratic congressman, Rep. Robert Andrews, said he's confident that lawmakers will support a bill he sponsored to upgrade the industry by requiring criminal background checks for all U.S. security guards.
"How much is it worth not to have one criminal guarding a nuclear power plant?" he asked.
Andrews said the checks will have the effect of raising pay, because they will weed out many guards whose criminal histories lead them to accept the lowest salaries.
"This is one area where doing things on the cheap is a really bad idea," Andrews said.
"A security officer is ... not trained to be a G.I. Joe," said Paul Maniscalco, a research scientist at George Washington University.
More than five years after the attacks, Maniscalco is helping to change the security guard culture. He recently developed an anti-terrorism computer course for shopping mall guards, who are being taught they now have more concerns than rowdy teenagers and shoplifters.
The middle-ground pay for security officers in 2006 was $23,620, according to a new Labor Department survey. The low pay reflects fierce competition among security firms, which submit the lowest possible bids. Lowball contracts also mean lower profit margins and less money for training and background checks for guards.
You can be the first to comment on this story.