Reader comments: The General's Daughter
MORESUNSHINEGRL | Sept. 7, 2000
I just fininshed watching this film. I liked it to begin I
have to say that I enjoyed the actors and the story.
Knowing it is a novel I will be looking for it soon. I can
say that yea I believe it could of happened. Which brings
me to the question was it fact or fiction I would like to
know. because if it's another Blair Bitch I will really be
disappointed in the entire movie. They should never leave
it to where the audience walks out shaking their heads
trying to figure it out.
CHERYL | May. 30, 2000
i love john travolta, i love the movie, and i love the
plot.
im sorry that you thought it flopped but you ask anyone who
saw it. thney LOVED it.
JAMES POE | Dec. 22, 1999
I loved the movie, I thought it was well done, until I read
your review. Most of your skepticisme is correct but some
are not. Overall I still liked the movie.
GARY NATIONS | Dec. 16, 1999
I thought it was ok, although in this day & age we live in
with such sensitive issues as race-I do agree with you.
That racial statement by John was uncalled for! As far as
full nudity, hey this is 1999-cursing to a limit is even on
prime time TV now-so that shouldn't be a problem. The only
thing that really excites my curiosity now is the fact that
I didn't know the movie was "NON-FICTION". Who was Gen
Campbell. I retired Army in '97 I never heard of him!
Although during one seen in the hanger I did spot a 101st
Airborne Screaming Eagle that I am sure
someone "conviently" forgot to pick before calling action.
Did the actions depicted here actually happen? Can someone
tell me? Gen Campbell- was Ft Campbell named after him?
Thanks for allowing me my opinion time!
Gary
***** | Aug. 13, 1999
I like John Travolta, I love James Woods and I like
whats-his-name (Babe) that plays the general. I hated this
movie. If I hadn't been there with my husband I would have
left without waiting to ask for my money back. This movie
had no soul, was a sicko and twisted in in it's assumptions,
presumptions and was chock full of stereotypes. It was a
waste of two hours of life and left me something less than
when I went in. I regret it.
FRANK | Jul. 10, 1999
This movie combines sex and violence in an exploitive way. The keys to the plot are not believeable. Hard to believe that a whole segment of West Point males would gang rape a female under any circumstances. Still harder to believe that any father would choose his career over his daughter. And still harder to believe that such a woman would allow herself to be staked out nude. I believe the actor who played the general also played a President who sold out his country in a Harrison Ford movie, so seeing him on the screen is a tip off that it will come back to him. Pretty much of a farce.
JULIE FROST | Jun. 29, 1999
Hollywood's blatant anti-military bias is getting more and
more annoying. Not only did this movie, which is based on a
NOVEL, leave the impression that it was a true incident at
the end ("General So-and-so was court-martialed"), but the
motivations of the characters were so twisted as to defy
believability. WARNING: SPOILERS FOLLOW!!!! First, we are
asked to believe that an Army General would look his
bruised, battered, bleeding daughter in the one good eye she
has left, while she's lying there in a hospital bed after
being repeatedly gang-raped all night long during a training
exercise at West Point, and tell her "It never happened" and
"You should forget about this for the good of the Army."
How is it "good for the Army" to let a bunch of violent
degenerates get away with rape? Are these the kind of
people any General would want defending the country under
his command? And then, what, she becomes the Queen of Kink
because of this? Seems like this was just an excuse for the
typical Hollywood dreck of adding sex and violence on top of
rape and brutality. And the one decent, caring guy in her
life helps her set up a horrifying situation so she can show
her dad (I use the term advisedly) what really happened?
Like he hadn't seen her in the hospital, battered beyond
recognition. And then dad just leaves her there, naked and
tied to the ground, in the middle of the night? What father
would do that? Then there's the whole deal with "The right
way, the wrong way, and the Army way." What exactly is the
"Army way"? To cover up a brutal rape by a bunch of cadets
so their classmates won't be bitter about women in the
military? That seems to be the message here. What a bunch
of Bravo Sierra. And then the Woods character either
commits suicide or is murdered over this, only they decline
to tell us which it is-and it does make a difference. The
only reason I even give it one star was because Travolta was
very good as the investigator, and Woods was excellent as
her CO. All I can say is, Ugh.
LINDA | Jun. 23, 1999
I found this a gripping story, extremely well-acted. It is
not for everyone, however. Travolta has displayed his
talents very well in this, and all the characters are well-
defined. I was aware of the outboard scene from a review
and chose not to watch that, and the story did not suffer
because of my decision. It was very intense and, unlike
other movies, did not appear to have a "slow" part. The
nudity, after the initial impact, was not concentrated on,
and I found the story itself to be the compelling issue.
Not a feel-good movie, to be sure, but well worth the price
and time.
Add your comment
Words Remaining
New Movie Trailers
Top Box Office
| 1. | Four Christmases | $31,069,826.00 |
| 2. | Bolt | $26,581,002.00 |
| 3. | Twilight | $26,344,032.00 |
| 4. | Quantum of Solace | $18,833,552.00 |
| 5. | Australia | $14,800,723.00 |
| 6. | Madagascar: Escape 2 Africa | $14,207,329.00 |
| 7. | Transporter 3 | $12,063,452.00 |
| 8. | Role Models | $5,191,180.00 |
| 9. | The Boy in the Striped Pajamas | $1,696,187.00 |
| 10. | Milk | $1,453,844.00 |


