Reader comments: 34 Utah schools poised to join NCLB's 'pass' list
2 comments | Read story
Anonymous | 8:53 a.m. Oct. 9, 2007
Jeff, I'm no fan of NCLB, but the proficiency standards are so low that your claim translates to: "it is not possible for our education system to reach a point where 90% of the students are at a 'D' level proficiency." Not only are these standards minimal, but there are so many "tricks" to get a passing AYP: confidence intervals, "safe harbor" (and even that uses a confidence interval to all allow a declining proficiency rate to masquerade as a 10% improvement!), and now we are allowing proficiency rate averaging. What a crock of low expectations!
If your claim is true, then we need to get not just the Federal government out of primary and secondary education, but we should probably get state and local government out as well. When I look at the raw proficiency rates for Granite School District's schools it turns my stomach.
If, as you say, parents don't care, it is because the product being offered has little value.
If your claim is true, then we need to get not just the Federal government out of primary and secondary education, but we should probably get state and local government out as well. When I look at the raw proficiency rates for Granite School District's schools it turns my stomach.
If, as you say, parents don't care, it is because the product being offered has little value.
Add your comment
Comments are monitored. Any comments found to be abusive, offensive, off-topic, misrepresentative, more than 200 words or containing URLs will not be posted.
Words Remaining



It's time to totally revamp NCLB and leave it up to each state to determine it's own accountability. Bush broke ranks with conservatives by putting Federal fingers into a State's right issue (and State's have always run their own educaitonal system). Education is best served when local educators, parents and local government at the lowest level work together for what is best for kids at the local level.