Reader comments: Sanpete bond still undecided

2 comments  |  Read story

Chris | 5:51 a.m. Nov. 13, 2007
Those that Voted no on this issue are basically saying this: "Voting no sends the message that Sanpete voters don’t want outside money to be spent in their county. Voting no sends the message to government agencies & businesses that may be looking to expand in Sanpete County to look elsewhere."

It's very sad that some in this county don't want it to expand, don't want jobs brought here.
From Manti Living in Logan | 10:01 a.m. Nov. 13, 2007
I still don't understand why we need a courthouse when the judges at the current court house only show up like two or three times a week. Are their case loads heavy? Then there should be more judges or justices appointed or something, right? This is an honest question, can anybody enlighten me?

Add your comment

Comments are monitored. Any comments found to be abusive, offensive, off-topic, misrepresentative, more than 200 words or containing URLs will not be posted.

Words Remaining

E-mail address: For internal use only. We may want to contact you to publish your comment (not your e-mail address) in the newspaper or for a separate story idea.

+ Click to enlarge
A drawing depicts the 6th District Court Building, which may be built in Manti if the bond passed. (Image by Joe Linton)
Image by Joe Linton
A drawing depicts the 6th District Court Building, which may be built in Manti if the bond passed.