the whole county rides off indian monies and is so remote..now with the lisbon mine shutting down that money becomes that more important.yet they would have you think that with the loss of 300,000 dollars from this mine the indian money doesn't afford the large non indian families quality education in other parts of this county. just count every census number bearing child vs. the non cesus and one gets a good picture of the dilema.

Yes, I can hear it now. The voucherites will say "but even some public schools are not accredited". No big deal. We only need to worry about accreditation when we are talking about private schools.

By definition, public schools are already accredited because they are run by the people and the locally elected school board.

More problems at Hillcrest High School! It would be great if the school board and the district would take a closer look at the administration of that school. I have a child that should attend Hillcrest in the next few years and I am very concerned at what appears to be a dis-functional principal and staff at the school.

Utah Republican? I look at it from a different perspective. Didn't the anit-voucherites claim that private schools weren't required to be accredited? How can you loose something you didn't have in the first place?

If public schools are accredited by default that answers many of my questions because they are educating by default as well. And where did you get the idea that schools are run by the people? "The people" does not include parents - and I say that from my own life experience.

Utah Republican: What did you just say??

So the headline of this article is "8 Utah schools could lose their accreditation", but in reading through the article twice, I'm still not sure which 8 those are. It mentions 4 public schools (Granger, Provo, Hillcrest, Navajo Mountain). Then later it talks about Meridian. And at the very end it lists 3 school that lost accreditation, none of which actually appear to be in business. I guess those 3 that already lost their accreditation are 3 of the 8 that "could" lose it? Or are there others that just didn't get mentioned in the article?

Whatever we do, let's make sure we DON'T change anything with regards to education, OK? All it needs is more money - this next little funding increase is going to fix everything.

Everything is perfect and working wonderfully - just add money.

To: Utah Republican | 6:40 a.m. Dec. 7, 2007
Are you serious? Do you understand what accreditation is? Just because it is a public school doesn't mean it is "ok" to have a Math teacher teach History or Chemistry unless they are qualified by accreditation to do so.
The private school is under fire because they have college professors teaching high school without the credentials to do so.
In my Utah high school I took German from my English teacher who never spoke any German before our class began. I was unable to take German after that because German on tape... just isn't the same as a German teacher. I am sure a German college professor could have done much better and my English teacher would have agreed.

I am very upset with this news! I went to Provo High graduated in 2000 from BYU and taught AP Chem and Chemisty in California for 6 years. I also have a masters degree in education. I applied for a position at Provo School district in the summer of 2006. I didn't even get an interview, and now I hear they have someone teaching Chemistry without a credential! This is one of the biggest problems with education. Why can't Utahans pay (qualified) teachers at least the national average and lower the class sizes to give the students a proper education. I am no longer teaching because I cannot support my family of 4 kids with the 35k that I was offered to teach at a charter school in Riverton. But I was willing to make it work if i could have taught and my Alma Mater! Well its their loss I guess.

So, last year there were 30 schools on the "advised" list. This year there are 8. Why didn't the headline read "Utah schools make dramatic improvement?" Guess that headline wouldn't make the paper.

Blame it on the administration level position. They are the responsible for overlooking the operations in each school. They aren't taking their job seriously, just trying to keep their job intact. They need to roll their sleeves and do something about it!

Are some of you commenting without reading the article? The threat of losing accreditation is because of overloaded classes and teachers teaching outside of their "qualified" area. These schools had sest limits of the number of students per teacher per 8 period classes. If our legislature would channel the funds so that the FTE could be changed and additional teachers hired, then the student limits could be met. UEA has been trying for years to get our legislators to understand the importance of lowering class size, but maybe it will take a few high schools losing accreditation to make them listen. The lack of "qualified" teachers is also an FTE problem. When the addition of a class is necessary, it is not always possible to hire another teacher --- even part-time. The example of an unqualified teacher teaching Chemistry was just that: an example. The actual specifics were not stated. We DO need more money in the public ed system to facilitate the increase of students and the classes that the increase requires. Families with 3+ children are not paying enough into the school system to make up the difference. We need state leaders with the balls to take action.

Solution: Double the property taxes and tax the non profits and place the money into education. And get rid of those unsightly, add on, "lambing sheds". My grandchildren are not lambs.

Higher taxes and more funding will do little to fix public education. Competition for the almight dollar would do wonders. A voucher system was shot down. How about if we give a tax credit to people who save us taxpayers money by taking their children out of public schools and put them in private schools. The private schools that would pop up overnight would do an excellent job, I'm sure, because they would compete against each other for that same almight dollar! Doubling property taxes will do nothing but raise people's rent. The low-income folks whose kids are often (actually, usually) the ones who do poorly in public schools can then work harder and longer and stay away from home, thus giving their kids less help and more emotional problems. My wife teaches, and believe me, most of her problem students -- those that have trouble learning -- have problems due to their parents. It has nothing to do with class size or the salary they pay teachers.

FYI--I agree with the post that the Headline is misleading.

It seems that reducing class size would fit the problems in the public schools described.

Even when I volunteered to teach on one of my prep periods and had 280 students (no joke), this is insane. But I have to feed my family.

Though reaching accreditation is a big deal because it is a hoop to go through for the schools, I don't think it really gives that great of a picture of the education going on in those schools. Granger has big issues. Provo and Hillcrest are changing dramatically in their demographics and have brought in IB programs. In many cases, IB classes are small and require other teachers to carry higher loads. Perhaps this could explain some of the problems.

In Provo HS's case, the school was rated amongst the best in Utah County by Utah Valley magazine which did look into factors like graduation rates, class sizes, AP offerings and other more "real factors" that really give a good indication of how a school is doing. Provo did just fine, and in fact, rated the highest of any Utah County high school in many categories.

Gimme a break, all we hear about are teachers being "underpaid". If you ask me, they are grossly OVERPAID. They make $35,000 for 9 mos work- that is $3888 per mo. Most of the time they are home by 4pm, no weekends, holidays either. I am a nurse, I work all night keeping people alive, for 12 mos a year, I dont make as much as these "underpaid" teachers. What a joke!!

To Overpaid Teachers (Nurse),
I am a teacher and I am quite offended by your viewpoint. First, I am never home before 6:00 in the evening, and I live within a block of my school. All of our teachers have to take on extra duties such as after school tutoring, coaching, advisory, etc. We have inservice and meetings afterschool on a regular basis. My contract clearly states that I can't even leave the building until 4 P.M. I personally coach 3 sports--year round--so I never leave the school before 6:00.

Second, I do work nights and weekends. It's called lesson planning and grading papers/assignments. Much of my free time is devoted to these activities, not leizure or my family.

Third, I don't just work 9 months of the year. A chunk of my summer is devoted to attending workshops, training, and taking college classes, all of which are required by my district.

Finally, I think it interesting that you are "keeping all these people alive," but complaing about the very profession who taught and prepared you for your career. Talk about biting the hands that fed you.