Reader comments: A win in Iowa caucuses doesn't really mean much
5 comments | Read story
SLC Native | 5:17 a.m. Jan. 4, 2008
I wonder if thissame article would have been written had Bernicks favorite boy won the prize? Chances are, it would have been very different. Oh well, just another day at the "Mitt Morning News".
Abe Tschetter | 6:51 a.m. Jan. 4, 2008
I totally agree with the first post. Had Mittney won, Iowa would just about have guaranteed the presidency and vindicated mormonism in the article. Somewhere, an angel would have received wings, probably.
kv | 9:56 a.m. Jan. 4, 2008
WOW, THAT WAS ONE OF THE MOST PATHETIC THINGS I'VE EVER READ!
Comments continue below
Utah Resident | 11:38 a.m. Jan. 4, 2008
Straight from Mitt's mouth: "In order to win the White House, I need to win both New Hampshire and Iowa"--Manchester Union-Leader, December 22. Now it's "just because you won the silver in one event doesn't mean you can't come back and win the gold". Romney's flip flops make even John Kerry look resolute and unchanging.
cw | 11:23 a.m. Jan. 15, 2008
Very interesting. Actually, I know that some supporters are going to try to throw Utah to Ron Paul by electing delegates in support of him. Whether this is ethical or not is unknown?
Add your comment
Comments are monitored. Any comments found to be abusive, offensive, off-topic, misrepresentative, more than 200 words or containing URLs will not be posted.
Words Remaining
