Reader comments: No-idling zone: Schools urge drivers to cut pollution by turning off buses, cars
8 comments | Read story
Good Idea | 4:35 a.m. Feb. 5, 2008
Actually, after 30 seconds of idling, you save fuel by turning off your car. What I really don't understand is why the drivers have to be "trained" in a "pilot program." How hard is it to turn the key?
Clare | 7:33 a.m. Feb. 5, 2008
As a school teacher, I know that the buses idle and the pollution is horrible. It makes me physically ill, and they waste a lot of fuel.
Comments continue below
Told You So | 8:11 a.m. Feb. 5, 2008
Back a few years ago, our school stopped bus service from our neighborhood because they decided we were less than two miles FROM THE BaCK BORDER of the school. But it ends up being more than two miles of walking to actually get into any building. as a result, about 50 cars come out of our neighborhood (even counting carpooling). I and others called the district office many times to complain about this decision and the variety of sure-to-happen consequences, one of which was pollution from the additional vehicles. Now it's like no one had ever thought of this! We'd even told district officials that parents would be willing to pay a little extra to help keep buses running in our area, but of course that suggestion was rejected without comment.
Finally | 11:38 a.m. Feb. 5, 2008
It is nice to know that someone else cares about toxic waste besides myself.
Allan | 12:14 p.m. Feb. 5, 2008
If we assume that the science is correct that idling more than 30 seconds causes more damage than turning off the car and restarting it...imagine how much gas we waste and pollution we create by having stop lights that are not coordinated to facilitate. Smooth flowing traffic doesn't just save the earth, but also time and energy. This is a good start. Now imagine how pollution is caused by idling at traffic lights that could easily be adjusted to intelligently increase the flow of cars rather than just constantly going green, yellow, red.
Harry | 12:35 p.m. Feb. 5, 2008
Nice start. But how about all the idling at drive up windows. Maybe we could consider a no drive up window policy between the hours of ten and four. That way those rushing to work and home from work could still have the convenience, but we wouldn't have non-stop idling.
BearOne | 12:48 p.m. Feb. 5, 2008
Another poorly disguised effort by the makers of starters and batteries.
Starters and Batteries are made to last for a certain number of cycles. Gee, if we can get people to use the starters and batteries twice as much, they will last half as long, and we will double our sales!
Especially for diesel buses, starters and batteries cost mega-bucks (several hundred dollars each) so if they last half as long----yea, we save on maintenance costs----
Starters and Batteries are made to last for a certain number of cycles. Gee, if we can get people to use the starters and batteries twice as much, they will last half as long, and we will double our sales!
Especially for diesel buses, starters and batteries cost mega-bucks (several hundred dollars each) so if they last half as long----yea, we save on maintenance costs----
Add your comment
Comments are monitored. Any comments found to be abusive, offensive, off-topic, misrepresentative, more than 200 words or containing URLs will not be posted.
Words Remaining




Just another example of government officials getting in the way of freedom and progress.