Reader comments: Trade-offs necessary in open society

3 comments  |  Read story

John | 9:07 a.m. Feb. 17, 2008
I applaud the enthusiasm expressed defending our freedoms, and agree with him!
However, it is a curious oversight that he omits the right to keep and bear arms (guaranteed under both the Federal and Utah Constitutions).

Perhaps the editorial tirades demanding more gun control in the past were all a mistake?

Speaking of Las Vegas, better check the odds before betting that the Editors will defend gun rights!
Anonymous | 11:03 a.m. Feb. 17, 2008
As someone entitled to carry concealed weapons, I only hope someday I'm also proven responsible enough to determine for myself whether or not I can drink a whole pitcher of beer. I can, by the way.
uncannygunman | 11:21 a.m. Feb. 17, 2008
I think a society of absolute rights would be unworkable. Still, once we start describing rights in terms of trade-offs, are we not like the woman who agrees to sex for $1 million? We are merely prostitutes, negotiating our price.
Comments continue below

Add your comment

Comments are monitored. Any comments found to be abusive, offensive, off-topic, misrepresentative, more than 200 words or containing URLs will not be posted.

Words Remaining

E-mail address: For internal use only. We may want to contact you to publish your comment (not your e-mail address) in the newspaper or for a separate story idea.