Reader comments: More tough questions for firm that wants to buy iProvo
4 comments | Read story
2B2 | 2:31 p.m. May 13, 2008
Yeah right B2! Then you will be the first one in line on the other side whining that they did not do due diligence in asking the right questions.
This whole things is so messed up. As was stated in the meeting the other day by the Qwest Rep., "Provo legally, the way Qwest reads it, in the new state statute could be their own provider." That is what should happen - why isn't it?
This whole things is so messed up. As was stated in the meeting the other day by the Qwest Rep., "Provo legally, the way Qwest reads it, in the new state statute could be their own provider." That is what should happen - why isn't it?
B2 | 5:27 p.m. May 13, 2008
Broadweave is not on trial - if you don't like the terms of the deal, DON'T sell. Provo hardly has the luxury of grilling Broadweave.
There's a reason this project should never have been undertaken by a gov't organization. They can't work backwards - private enterprise is NOT subject to the same scrutiny.
There's a reason this project should never have been undertaken by a gov't organization. They can't work backwards - private enterprise is NOT subject to the same scrutiny.
Comments continue below
Show me the MONEY $$$ | 10:17 p.m. May 13, 2008
Broadweave wants the favorable interest rates, no money down, cash out of the deal, and is hardly more than a shell company that is using Provo's bond rating and taxpayer dollars to fund their future profits.
Add your comment
Comments are monitored. Any comments found to be abusive, offensive, off-topic, misrepresentative, more than 200 words or containing URLs will not be posted.
Words Remaining
As if their bungling ways allow them the right to question successful private enterprise.
If I were Broadweave, I'd be tempted to pull the offer - watch iProvo and the city scramble then...