Reader comments: Legislators look at guzzlers in fleet
4 comments | Read story
Mike | 6:46 a.m. Sept. 17, 2008
LOL, "Real World Disconnect". So what else is new with Utah. This is the norm for the entire state of Utah.
Hey Jonathan Ball | 9:20 a.m. Sept. 17, 2008
State agencies already pay for the fuel they use. Div of Fleet bills currently bills all state agencies for the fuel they use plus a 3% admin charge. Don't be fooled by Margaret and her continuous attempts to deflect her shortcomings by blaming someone else.
Comments continue below
kba | 11:14 a.m. Sept. 17, 2008
How about eliminating the free gas that state appointed judges get to drive to work?
Even though that won't save the state millions of dollars, it would even the playing field when it comes to eating higher fuei costs we all have to endure as we pay our own way to drive to work.
Even though that won't save the state millions of dollars, it would even the playing field when it comes to eating higher fuei costs we all have to endure as we pay our own way to drive to work.
Add your comment
Comments are monitored. Any comments found to be abusive, offensive, off-topic, misrepresentative, more than 200 words or containing URLs will not be posted.
Words Remaining



A better way, probably the best way, to conserve and be clean, is to simply drive less. Email, paper mail, walk, bicycle, bus, TRAX, all avoid the "need" to drive around in a guzzler. Start there. When (and if) hybrids become economically justifiable, then start purchasing and using them.
Make state agencies purchase cars sized for their usual use, not for their maximum use. I'm sure there's a need for a 7+ passenger suv once in a while, but 99% of the time a 2-3 passenger sedan will suffice. Or, in other words, get your butts into a sedan, you can fit, don't clobber me with taxes so you can spread out in a big suv.