Reader comments: One report clears Palin
6 comments | Read story
Brother Chuck Schroeder | 8:15 a.m. Oct. 10, 2008
Conservatives know by now that the dominant liberal media is not just out to criticize Gov. Sarah Palin. They are on a drive to destroy her. The media have learned their lesson. They generally tolerated the rise of Ronald Reagan. They didn't take him that seriously. After two decades of rampant liberalism, the Left still controlled Congress most of the time, along with the courts and local legislatures. The teachers' unions kept a firm grip on the kids. Judges ruled for criminals and against business. Big city newspapers backed the Democrat Party. In other words, liberals still controlled all of American but the White House, and that too would pass. But Reagan fooled them. His campaign wasn't only about him. He ushered in a new generation of conservatives who won local and federal elections. They eventually captured both sides of Congress in 1994, stopping Bill Clinton in his tracks. The Reagan conservatives led to right-leaning judges who started to rule in favor of gun owners and parents and the military. If Palin were a liberal Democrat touting the same achievements she would have achieved sainthood by now in the pages of the New York Times.
McCain & Sarah 2008
McCain & Sarah 2008
Sarah's a much better pick | 9:14 a.m. Oct. 10, 2008
Article II, not I, describes the executive branch. Someone tell Biden, who is supposed to be a lawyer. Apart from getting the Articles of the Constitution mixed up, what on earth does Biden mean when he says that the vice president has no authority relative to Congress, apart from breaking ties?, in his long speech at the debate on vice president Dick Cheney's "dangerous" belief that "he's part of the legislative branch." The great constitutional scholar Biden cited Article I of the Constitution as proof that Cheney "works in the executive branch" and has "no authority relative to the Congress." Somebody please tell me that Biden wasn't picked for the Democrat ticket based on his knowledge of the Constitution, that he wants to change.
Sarah and McCain 2008
Sarah and McCain 2008
Comments continue below
Observer | 9:46 a.m. Oct. 10, 2008
So the McCain campaign issued their own report clearing Palin before the official investigation report came out? Now that is hilarious. Do they really expect anyone who has an ounce of common sense to believe this? The actions of McCain/Palin and their supporters are getting more erratic every day. But then, when you're tanking in the polls, falling farther and farther behind in the presidential race, you have to do something, no matter how ridiculous it may be. McCain appears to be one step away from going off the deep end.
Re: Observer 9:46AM | 1:19 p.m. Oct. 10, 2008
They are doing their best to impugn you and McCain-Palin supporters like they impugn the US military. They want you portrayed as a bunch of lunatic redneck hicks. Don't make me go through this again because I'm going to get red faced and livid all over again. They ignore the people in their party that urged the assassination of Bush, via movie and via book, and they critically acclaim both, the movies and the books. These are the people that hang Bush in effigy at anti-war rallies. These are some of the meanest, most vile people in the country, the supporters of the Democrat Party and the Obama ticket. They are deranged, they are unhinged, and they are genuinely dangerous. The media will not talk about that at all. They praise them as being activists and getting involved. These lunatics are the same people that run these websites, and they are sources for the Associated Press. Make no mistake about it, the enemy in this campaign is not just Obama and his cronies. The media is as well. McCain and Sarah in 2009.
Brother Chuck Schroeder | 1:22 p.m. Oct. 10, 2008
The crowds that are greeting Sarah Palin are huge. I don't know if you've noticed, but Barry's crowds are shrinking. When was the last time you saw a video piece, a television report of an Obama crowd? The Greek rally at the convention was the last time. When you see Obama on television now it's just a head shot of him at the podium with the selected white supporters carrying a sign sitting behind him. But they don't show you the whole crowd. Mary Mitchell, a wuss, wimp columnist for the Chicago Sun-Times says that Sarah Palin should be censured. She says that "Sarah Palin should apologize to the Obama campaign and the American people for her role in bringing out the worst in her supporters." This is laughable. Come on, Mary. Grow up. This is the big leagues. How about the people in your party? I know you're a Democrat, Mary Mitchell. You can't deny it, all you liberal media people are Democrats. What about the incitement of this whole country that you and your fellow journalists have engaged in along with the Democrat Party? You have gendered up hate for this president only. McCain and Sarah 2008.
Add your comment
Comments are monitored. Any comments found to be abusive, offensive, off-topic, misrepresentative, more than 200 words or containing URLs will not be posted.
Words Remaining



The pro-life, pro-gun Palin, age 44, is the first conservative on the scene since Reagan who can threaten that agenda with a political counter-insurgency.
Vote 4 McCain and Sarah 2008